Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Fulford v. Whitley

decided: July 20, 1993.

JOHN FULFORD, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,
v.
JOHN P. WHITLEY, WARDEN, LOUISIANA STATE PENITENTIARY, RESPONDENT-APPELLEE.



Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana. {Counsel}{Q}Counsel{/Q}{/Counsel}

FOR JOHN FULFORD, Petitioner-Appellant: John Fulford, (Pro Se), #73083, Camp D, Hawk 4-R-13, LSP, Angola, LA 70712. Professor David Gruning, c/o Loyola Law School, 7214 St. Charles Ave., NOLA 70118, 861-5550, (Ct.-Apptd.).

FOR JOHN P. WHITLEY, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary, Respondent-Appellee: Jack Peebles, ADA, 619 South White St., NOLA 70119, (504) 822-2414.

Before Politz, Chief Judge, King, Garwood, Jolly, Higginbotham, Davis, Jones, Smith, Duhe, Wiener, Barksdale, E. Garza, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

Author: The Court

ON SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

BY THE COURT:

A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion for rehearing en banc and a majority of the Judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

19930720

© 1998 VersusLaw ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.