Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Securities & Exchange Commission v. Huffman

decided: August 27, 1993.

SECURITIES & EXCHANGE COMMISSION, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE-CROSS-APPELLANT,
v.
MAXWELL C. HUFFMAN, JR., ET AL., DEFENDANTS, MAXWELL C. HUFFMAN, JR., JAMES T. HENRY AND JOHN T. FORSBERG, DEFENDANTS-CROSS-APPELLEES, AND JAMES F. STEWART, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT-CROSS-APPELLEE.



Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas; {Judge}{Q}Judges{/Q}{/Judge}

Before Politz, Chief Judge, Goldberg, and Jones, Circuit Judges.

Author: Per Curiam; Jones

ON SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

Per Curiam:

Treating the suggestion for rehearing en banc as a petition for panel rehearing, it is ordered that the petition for panel rehearing is DENIED. No member of the panel nor Judge in regular active service of this Court having requested that the Court be polled on rehearing en banc (Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure and Local Rule 35), the suggestion for Rehearing En Banc is DENIED.

ENTERED FOR THE COURT:

Edith H. Jones

United States Circuit Judge

19930827

© 1998 VersusLaw ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.