Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Kimberly Woodfork, Appellant v. Bank of America

April 11, 2013

KIMBERLY WOODFORK, APPELLANT
v.
BANK OF AMERICA, APPELLEE



On Appeal from County Civil Court at Law No. 4 Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1018590

Per curiam.

In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

ORDER

On April 1, 2013, appellant filed a brief that is not in compliance with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. The brief fails generally to comply with the rules. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.1(a), (b), (c), (d), (e), (f), (g), (h), (i), (j) and (k).

Accordingly, we order appellant's brief filed April 1, 2013, stricken. Appellant is ordered to file a brief that complies with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure on or before April 22, 2013, of the date of this order. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.1(a), (b), (c), (d), (e), (f), (g), (h), (i), (j) and (k).

If appellant files another brief that does not comply with Rule 38, the Court may strike the brief, prohibit appellant from filing another, and proceed as if appellant had failed to file a brief. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.9(a). Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.8(a), where an appellant has failed to file a brief, we may dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. If appellant fails to timely file a brief in accordance with Rule 38, the appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1).

Panel consists of Justices Boyce, Jamison and Busby.

20130411

© 1992-2013 VersusLaw ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.