FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION ON GUILTY PLEA BEFORE THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
ZACK HAWTHORN, Magistrate Judge.
By order of the District Court, this matter is referred to the undersigned United States Magistrate Judge for administration of the guilty plea under Rule 11. Magistrate judges have the statutory authority to conduct a felony guilty plea proceeding as an "additional duty" pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(3). United States v. Bolivar-Munoz , 313 F.3d 253, 255 (5th Cir. 2002).
On November 8, 2013, this case came before the undersigned United States Magistrate Judge for entry of a guilty plea by the Defendant, Donald Arthur Vaughn, to Counts One and Ten of the Indictment. Count One of the Indictment alleges that on or about August 22, 2011, and ending on or about January 10, 2012, the Defendant and others known and unknown to the Grand Jury, devised a scheme and artifice to defraud BBVA Compass Bank and Community Bank of Texas, federally insured depository institutions under § 3(c)(2) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act, and Mobiloil Federal Credit Union and Eastex Federal Credit Union, credit unions with accounts insured by the National Credit Union Share Insurance Fund, and to obtain money, funds, credits, and assets under the custody or control of said federally insured depository institutions and credit unions by means of materially false and fraudulent representations, all in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1344 and 2.
Count Ten alleges that from on or about August 1, 2011 through on or about January 10, 2012, in the Eastern District of Texas, Donald Arthur Vaughn and a co-defendant, did knowingly possess and use, without lawful authority, a means of identification of another person, specifically, the name, date of birth, address, and Texas driver's license number of C.F. Mortimer during an in relation to an unlawful activity that consitutes a violation of federal law, to wit, Bank Fraud under 18 U.S.C. § 1344, all in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1028A(a)(1) and 2.
The Defendant, Donald Arthur Vaughn, entered a plea of guilty to Counts One and Ten of the Indictment into the record at the hearing. After conducting the proceeding in the form and manner prescribed by Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11, the undersigned finds:
a. That the Defendant, after consultation with his attorney, has knowingly, freely and voluntarily consented to the administration of the guilty plea in this case by a United States Magistrate Judge in the Eastern District of Texas subject to a final approval and imposition of sentence by the District Court.
b. That Defendant and the Government have entered into a plea agreement which was disclosed and addressed in open court, entered into the record, and placed under seal. The Defendant verified that he understood the terms of the plea agreement, agreed to the Government's summary of the plea agreement, and acknowledged that it was his signature on the plea agreement. To the extent the plea agreement contains recommendations and requests pursuant to FED. R. CRIM. P. 11 (c)(1)(B), the court advised the Defendant that he has no right to withdraw the plea if the Court does not follow the particular recommendations or requests. To the extent that any or all of the terms of the plea agreement are pursuant to Rule 11(c)(1)(A) or (C), the undersigned advised the Defendant that he will have the opportunity to withdraw his plea of guilty should the Court not follow those particular terms of the plea agreement.
c. That the Defendant is fully competent and capable of entering an informed plea, that the Defendant is aware of the nature of the charges and the consequences of the plea, and that the plea of guilty is made freely, knowingly, and voluntarily. Upon addressing the Defendant personally in open court, the undersigned determines that the Defendant's plea is knowing and voluntary and did not result from force, threats or promises (other than the promises set forth in the plea agreement). See FED. R. CRIM. P. 11(b)(2).
d. That the Defendant's knowing and voluntary plea is supported by an independent factual basis establishing each of the essential elements of the offense and the Defendant realizes that his conduct falls within the definition of the crimes charged under 18 U.S.C. §§§ 1324, 1028A and 2.
STATEMENT OF REASONS
As factual support for the Defendant's guilty plea, the Government presented a factual basis. See Factual Basis and Stipulation. In support, the Government would prove that Donald Arthur Vaughn, is one and the same person charged in the Indictment and that the events described in the Indictment occurred in the Eastern District of Texas and elsewhere. The Government would also have proven, beyond a reasonable doubt, each and every essential element of the offense as alleged in Counts One and Ten of the Indictment through the testimony of witnesses, including expert witnesses, and admissible exhibits. In support of the Defendant's plea, the undersigned incorporates the proffer of evidence described in detail in the factual basis and stipulation, and the representations made by counsel for the Government at the hearing.
The Defendant, Donald Arthur Vaughn, agreed with and stipulated to the evidence presented in the factual basis and agreed to the Government's proffer. Counsel for the Defendant and the Government attested to the Defendant's competency and capability to enter an informed plea of guilty. The Defendant agreed with the evidence presented by the Government and personally testified that he was entering his guilty plea knowingly, freely and voluntarily.
IT IS THEREFORE the recommendation of the undersigned United States Magistrate Judge that the District Court accept the Guilty Plea of the Defendant which the undersigned determines to be supported by an independent factual basis establishing each of the essential elements of the offense charged in Counts One and Ten of the Indictment. Accordingly, it is further recommended that the Defendant be finally adjudged guilty of the charged offenses under ...