Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Eidos Display, LLC v. Au Optronics Corporation

United States District Court, Fifth Circuit

January 22, 2014

EIDOS DISPLAY, LLC, and EIDOS III, LLC
v.
AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION; AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION AMERICA; CHUNGHWA PICTURE TUBES, LTD

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

LEONARD DAVIS, District Judge.

The above entitled and numbered civil action was referred to United States Magistrate Judge John D. Love pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 636. The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge ("Report"), which contains his proposed findings of fact and recommendation for the disposition of such action, has been presented for consideration (Doc. No. 412). The Magistrate Judge recommends granting Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment of Indefiniteness (Doc. No. 314). Plaintiff filed objections (Doc. No. 415) to which Defendants replied (Doc. No. 416). Plaintiff filed a response (Doc. No. 417) accompanied by a Motion for Leave to Allow a Reply Brief (Doc. No. 418) which is hereby GRANTED.

The Court is of the opinion that the conclusion of the Magistrate Judge is correct. Plaintiff's objections are overruled. Therefore, the Court hereby adopts the Order of the United States Magistrate Judge as the findings and conclusions of this Court and ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.