Court of Appeals of Texas, Third District, Austin
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM TRAVIS COUNTY
Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Pemberton and Rose
J. Woodfin Jones, Chief Justice
Relator, Raul Adam Trevino, an inmate in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice (TDCJ), filed a pro se motion in this Court seeking an "emergency injunction against unrelated parties in interest." Looking to the substance of Trevino's motion, rather than its title or form, we construe his motion as a petition for writ of mandamus. See Surgitek, Bristol-Myers Corp. v. Abel, 997 S.W.2d 598, 601 (Tex. 1999) (courts look to substance of pleading rather than its caption or form to determine its nature); see also Tex. Gov't Code § 22.221; Tex.R.App.P. 52.1. In his petition, Trevino asks us to compel certain prison officials—namely "the Daniel Unit Law Library Supervisor J. Floyd and the overall TDCJ agency administration"—to take, or refrain from taking, particular actions.
This Court does not have mandamus jurisdiction over the TDCJ or personnel thereof. By statute, this Court has the authority to issue a writ of mandamus against "a judge of a district or county court in the court of appeals district" and other writs as necessary to enforce our appellate jurisdiction. See Tex. Gov't Code § 22.221. Staff members of the Daniel Unit and unnamed prison employees and officials are not parties against whom we have the power to issue a writ of mandamus. Nor has Trevino demonstrated that the exercise of our writ power is necessary to enforce our ...