Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Evicam International, Inc. v. Enforcement Video, LLC

United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Sherman Division

June 5, 2017

EVICAM INTERNATIONAL, INC.
v.
ENFORCEMENT VIDEO, LLC d/b/a WATCHGUARD VIDEO

          MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

          AMOS L. MAZZANT UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

         Pending before the Court is Enforcement Video, LLC d/b/a WatchGuard Video's (“WatchGuard”) Motion for Summary Judgment for Invalidity Against the Asserted Claims of U.S. Patent No. 6, 211, 907 (Dkt. #68). After considering the relevant pleadings, the Court denies WatchGuard's motion.

         BACKGROUND

         Evicam International, Inc. (“Evicam”) alleges WatchGuard infringes U.S. Patent Nos. 6, 211, 907 (the “'907 Patent”) and 6, 950, 013. For the '907 Patent, Evicam asserts Claims 3, 8, 13, 18, 19, 22, 24, and 27 (the “Asserted Claims”). Every Asserted Claim depends from either independent Claim 1 or 26, which share common claim elements. All Asserted Claims except for Claim 27 depend on independent Claim 1. Claim 1 recites:

1. An on board secure vehicle mounted surveillance system comprising:
a) at least one video camera monitoring the interior and the exterior of the vehicle and for generating video signals of an incident proximate the vehicle;
b) a recording device for capturing and securely storing and video signals having a coded access;
c) a code for providing coded access to said recording device;
d) means for down loading said video signal from said coded access recording device.

'907 Patent at 10:51-61. Asserted Claim 27 depends on independent Claim 26, which similarly recites:

26. A method for the secure surveillance of incidents involving vehicles comprising:
a) activating an on board secure vehicle mounted surveillance system having at least one video camera for generating video signals of an incident proximate to the vehicle;
b) generating a video signal of an incident proximate to the vehicle;
c) storing said video signal of an incident proximate to the vehicle on a secure large capacity, code ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.