Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Dunne v. Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance Co.

United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division

January 10, 2020

Zachary Dunne, Plaintiff,
v.
Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance Company, Defendant.

          MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

          Gray H. Miller Senior United States District Judge

         Pending before the court is defendant Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance Company's (“Allstate”) motion for summary judgment. Dkt. 13. Plaintiff Zachary Dunne responded and the motion is ripe for consideration. Dkt. 18. Having considered the motion, response, reply, sur-reply, and both parties' supplemental briefing, the court is of the opinion that Allstate's motion for summary judgment should be GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.

         I. Background

         The parties do not dispute the essential facts. A storm damaged Dunne's house on or about June 20, 2018. Dkt. 13 at 3. At the time, Dunne's house was insured under an Allstate Homeowner's Policy (the “Policy”). Id. Dunne reported a claim to Allstate regarding the storm damage on July 3, 2018. Id. Allstate's adjuster inspected the property and determined the damage was below Dunne's deductible and denied the claim. Id.

         Pursuant to the Texas Insurance Code, Dunne sent a pre-suit notice letter to Allstate after the initial inspection. Dkt. 18 at 2. Allstate requested a re-inspection and again determined the damage was below Dunne's deductible despite increasing its estimate. Id. Dunne proceeded to file suit on October 29, 2018 for breach of contract, and statutory claims for bad faith and failure to promptly pay Dunne's insurance claim. Id.

         On January 10, 2019, Allstate invoked the appraisal provision in the Policy, which provides a means for determining the amount of loss when the insurer and insured cannot agree. Dkt. 13 at 3, 51. The parties' chosen appraisers returned an agreed signed appraisal on February 19, 2019, and Allstate issued checks totaling the appraisal amount less depreciation and deductible that same day. Id. at 4. Allstate notified Dunne of its intent to pay on February 20, 2019. Id.; Dkt 18 at 5. Dunne cashed these checks on February 26, 2019. Dkt. 18 at 6; see also Dkt. 13 at 128-31.

         II. Legal Standard

         A court shall grant summary judgment when a “movant shows that there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(a). “[A] fact is genuinely in dispute only if a reasonable jury could return a verdict for the nonmoving party.” Fordoche, Inc. v. Texaco, Inc., 436 F.3d 388, 392 (5th Cir. 2006). The moving party bears the initial burden of demonstrating the absence of a genuine issue of material fact. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 323, 106 S.Ct. 2540 (1986). If the moving party meets its burden, the burden shifts to the non-moving party to set forth specific facts showing a genuine issue for trial. Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(e). The court must view the evidence in the light most favorable to the non-movant and draw all justifiable inferences in favor of the non-movant. Envtl. Conservation Org. v. City of Dallas, 529 F.3d 519, 524 (5th Cir. 2008).

         III. Analysis

         A. Breach of Contract Claim

         Allstate asserts that Dunne cannot maintain his breach of contract claim because Allstate timely paid all damages determined by the appraisal. Dkt. 13 at 4. Under nearly identical facts, the Supreme Court of Texas held that “an insurer's payment of an apprisal award . . . forecloses liability on a breach of contract claim.” Ortiz v. State Farm Lloyds, No. 17-1048, 2019 WL 2710032, at *3 (Tex. June 28, 2019). However, Dunne refutes that Allstate timely paid under the Policy thereby precluding Allstate's estoppel defense. Dkt. 18 at 6-7.

         Under Texas Law, insurance policies are interpreted “under the well-established rules of contract construction.” Great Am. Ins. Co. v. Primo, 512 S.W.3d 890, 892 (Tex. 2017). “The goal of contract interpretation is to ascertain the parties' true intent as expressed by the plain language they used.” Id. at 893. “[E]very contract should be interpreted as a whole and in accordance with the plain meaning of its terms, ” and “no provision is rendered meaningless.” Id. at 892-93. Terms are assigned “their ordinary and generally accepted meaning unless the contract directs otherwise.” Id. at 893. “If the language lends itself to a clear and definite legal meaning, the contract is not ambiguous and will be construed as a matter of law.” Id. Ambiguities arise “only when the contract is actually susceptible to two or more reasonable interpretations.” Id. (Internal quotations omitted). “The fact that the parties disagree about the policy's meaning does not create an ambiguity.” Id.

         Under the Policy, Allstate must “settle any covered loss with [Dunne] . . . within [five] business days after the amount of loss is finally determined. Dkt. 13 at 51. The appraisers' agreed written report definitively determined the amount of loss. Id. (“If the appraisers submit a written report of an agreement to [Dunne] and [Allstate], the amount agreed shall be the amount of loss.”). The Policy provides two options for settlement: Allstate may opt to either (1) repair or (2) pay for the damaged property. Id. at 49. If Allstate notifies Dunne that it will pay his claim, Allstate must pay within five business days after it notifies Dunne. Id. at 51.

         In this case, Allstate received the appraisers written report on February 19, 2019 and at that point had five business days to settle with Dunne. On February 20, 2019, Allstate notified Dunne that it would pay for the damaged property. Allstate's notice triggered a new five business day period within which it had to pay Dunne. That deadline was February 26, 2019-the date upon which Dunne cashed Allstate's checks. The evidence clearly establishes that Allstate timely paid the appraisal award under the Policy. ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.